In the business world , there are cases of unethical behavior that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that challenge the core of professional ethics . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , is a perfect example of the latter — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that severely undermines the reputation of a lone supervisor but calls into question over the organization’s values .
In spite of numerous complaints, Collins has held onto his title , visibly unaffected by the uproar swirling around him . How has this been allowed to persist ? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? Based on insider information , Collins’ history of questionable behavior was initiated by breaking of the business principles, but it didn’t cease there. Instead, it intensified into a chain of concerning actions that has left fellow employees demoralized and stakeholders confused .
Amid a management development session — supposedly designed to boost managerial skills —David Collins allegedly transformed what should have been a development chance into a spree of inappropriate episodes . It’s reported he spent company-sponsored junkets engaging in flirtatious behavior , a glaring violation of Ventia’s corporate ethics , all while his home life was kept in the dark.
But the ethical breaches didn’t cease at those affairs. One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged improper Ventia use of company IT systems to send explicit photos to women—a blatant abuse of professional tools and a violation of confidentiality . His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to distribute risqué communications—including emoticons signaling illicit encounters — reveals a character of a man heedless of the repercussions . Following these digital flirtations , Collins allegedly intensified his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on multiple occasions during business days , despite his being married and her having a partner . This transparent exploitation of company time and resources broke all norms of professionalism but resulted in personal devastation —creating a trail of betrayal that extended past the organizational context.
Why can this behavior be enabled to endure ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly shattered all norms is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, stems from a concerning absence of supervision within the organization . Issues have been raised , yet Collins persists unabated.
This deficiency of accountability conveys a risky precedent : that status and power within the enterprise can protect individuals from consequences . It promotes a hostile office atmosphere , disheartens staff , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .